000 | 01666nab a2200325 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 021484 | ||
003 | CO-UCACDB | ||
005 | 20230801172334.0 | ||
005 | 20080312. 04:11:06 p.m., cml | ||
005 | 20080312. 04:53:16 p.m., cml | ||
005 | 20090609. 16:34:15, lcifu | ||
005 | 20091019. 16:58:24, lcifu | ||
008 | 080312s2007 ck a r 000 0 spa d | ||
040 |
_aCO-UCAC _cCO-UCAC |
||
041 | _aspa | ||
043 | _ack | ||
100 | 1 |
_9104551 _aElkamchouchi, Hassan |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAutomating the electromagnetic simulation procedure and its possible "fatal" consequences / _cHassan Elkamchouchi y Gehan Abouelseoud |
336 |
_2rdacontenido _aTexto |
||
337 |
_2rdamedio _aNo mediado |
||
338 |
_2rdasoporte _avolumen |
||
500 | _aSOLICITAR EL ARTICULO EN EL PROGRAMA DE ELECTRONICA Y TELECOMUNICACIONES | ||
506 | _aElectrónica y Telecomunicaciones | ||
506 | _aSistemas | ||
520 | _aThe purpose of this paper is to show how the tendency to fully automate the electromagnetic simulation procedure without attention to the physical nature of the problem, as well as understanding the numerical procedure used, may lead a designer to making wrong decisions. Promising designs may be aborted, while others that should be aborted may be moved on to the prototyping step, causing loss of time and money. The study is based on reputable simulators: IE3D and Fidelity from Zeland, and the microstripes simulador from Flomerics | ||
650 | 0 | 7 |
_aELECTROMAGNETISMO _9194507 |
773 | 0 |
_tIEEE Antennas & Propagation Magazine _dBogotá : CINTEL, 2007 _gVol.49, no. 2 (abr. 2007) ; p. 133-142 _x1045-9243 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cAS |
||
999 |
_c12763 _d12763 |